<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going by the Numbers &#8211; Garmin Edge 500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:00:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17630</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17630</guid>
		<description>Actually the powertap unit is totally capable of displaying power, speed, and HR all on the same screen.. its exactly how I have mine setup.. the only current drawbacks I have with the current Cycleops head is no altitude, and inability to view avg power from your last interval... reason why I am considering a 500.. but it has its drawbacks as well... Joule looks very promising, but I dont want a laptop computer on my stem :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the powertap unit is totally capable of displaying power, speed, and HR all on the same screen.. its exactly how I have mine setup.. the only current drawbacks I have with the current Cycleops head is no altitude, and inability to view avg power from your last interval&#8230; reason why I am considering a 500.. but it has its drawbacks as well&#8230; Joule looks very promising, but I dont want a laptop computer on my stem <img src='http://www.velodramatic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Wyman</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17552</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Wyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17552</guid>
		<description>If more than three screens were available on the 500, I&#039;d be a happier cyclist. I like having no more than two fields displayed on one screen - anymore than that and my aging eyes, even with glasses, have trouble reading the numbers. Now, if the device was the size of an iPad....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If more than three screens were available on the 500, I&#8217;d be a happier cyclist. I like having no more than two fields displayed on one screen &#8211; anymore than that and my aging eyes, even with glasses, have trouble reading the numbers. Now, if the device was the size of an iPad&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Velodramatic</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17543</link>
		<dc:creator>Velodramatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17543</guid>
		<description>Stephen,

To tell you the truth I&#039;m not absolutely sure. In the past they didn&#039;t have feature parity when the Motionbased service was part of the equation. Motionbased was definitely superior to GTC.
I suspect that they do much the same thing now, but Connect is almost certain to be the better-looking experience. Also depends on whether you value the online repository angle for data safety... I do in principle.

Wish I had the energy to load GTC and revisit the differences, but I&#039;m going to stick with Connect for now. I uploaded my second batch of rides last night, and that went through without incident. Had my stuff named and ran a quick report in ten minutes.

::M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen,</p>
<p>To tell you the truth I&#8217;m not absolutely sure. In the past they didn&#8217;t have feature parity when the Motionbased service was part of the equation. Motionbased was definitely superior to GTC.<br />
I suspect that they do much the same thing now, but Connect is almost certain to be the better-looking experience. Also depends on whether you value the online repository angle for data safety&#8230; I do in principle.</p>
<p>Wish I had the energy to load GTC and revisit the differences, but I&#8217;m going to stick with Connect for now. I uploaded my second batch of rides last night, and that went through without incident. Had my stuff named and ran a quick report in ten minutes.</p>
<p>::M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17542</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17542</guid>
		<description>Apologies if this is a really stupid comment.  That being said, looking at the Garmin website, looks as though one can either download the data online &quot;Garmin Connect&quot; or to offline software &quot;Garmin Training Center.&quot;

Besides being able to share, do these do the same thing?

Is the offline software as &quot;buggy&quot; as the online software?

Great website!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies if this is a really stupid comment.  That being said, looking at the Garmin website, looks as though one can either download the data online &#8220;Garmin Connect&#8221; or to offline software &#8220;Garmin Training Center.&#8221;</p>
<p>Besides being able to share, do these do the same thing?</p>
<p>Is the offline software as &#8220;buggy&#8221; as the online software?</p>
<p>Great website!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17539</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 04:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17539</guid>
		<description>I checked out Entry Works via the link in Matt MC&#039;s comment... I think I&#039;ll stick with the online Garmin software for now. Entry Works looks like a little bit too much work - it&#039;s clearly very, very detailed, but I really do quite like the interface of the Garmin online app and the fact that it&#039;s a trivial matter for me to upload a workout. Something that&#039;s important when I&#039;ve just gotten in from several hours on the bike!

Appreciate the pointers - also had a look at Ascent (was put onto this software by a chap in my LBS), that&#039;s a great looking tool and something that I might use in future as it&#039;s a nice bridge between too much complexity and too little information.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked out Entry Works via the link in Matt MC&#8217;s comment&#8230; I think I&#8217;ll stick with the online Garmin software for now. Entry Works looks like a little bit too much work &#8211; it&#8217;s clearly very, very detailed, but I really do quite like the interface of the Garmin online app and the fact that it&#8217;s a trivial matter for me to upload a workout. Something that&#8217;s important when I&#8217;ve just gotten in from several hours on the bike!</p>
<p>Appreciate the pointers &#8211; also had a look at Ascent (was put onto this software by a chap in my LBS), that&#8217;s a great looking tool and something that I might use in future as it&#8217;s a nice bridge between too much complexity and too little information.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt mc</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17531</link>
		<dc:creator>matt mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17531</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review of the Garmin.

However, I think Garmin has a LONG way to go before I start shelling out cash, because the software is just to buggy.

I personally don&#039;t need the GPS part of my rides, but I do obsess about my numbers (I&#039;m an Engineer, it&#039;s part of me).

I use a little less complicated system, but very &quot;nerdy&quot; to track all of my rides.

I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.entryworks.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Entry Works&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s FREE, it&#039;s easy to use, you can output everything to graphs and charts and all kinds of other nerdy things.

It&#039;s also good for Tri-athletes, Swimmers, Runners, Weight lifting, Walking, and other fitness exercises.  You can also track weight, calories, and other health related items.  It&#039;ll even calculate your estimated CO2 foot print.

There are Mapping options to draw a route, with the ability to output directions, just not to a GPS device. (Although, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it came out soon.) I can even update a ride on my cell phone web browser and keep track as I ride.

I&#039;ve been using Entry Works since 2006, and I have found it to be great.

If anyone is looking for a slightly less complicated way of tracking your workouts/rides, you should check it out.

P.S. - Great site, and great photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review of the Garmin.</p>
<p>However, I think Garmin has a LONG way to go before I start shelling out cash, because the software is just to buggy.</p>
<p>I personally don&#8217;t need the GPS part of my rides, but I do obsess about my numbers (I&#8217;m an Engineer, it&#8217;s part of me).</p>
<p>I use a little less complicated system, but very &#8220;nerdy&#8221; to track all of my rides.</p>
<p>I use <a href="http://www.entryworks.com/" rel="nofollow">Entry Works</a>.  It&#8217;s FREE, it&#8217;s easy to use, you can output everything to graphs and charts and all kinds of other nerdy things.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also good for Tri-athletes, Swimmers, Runners, Weight lifting, Walking, and other fitness exercises.  You can also track weight, calories, and other health related items.  It&#8217;ll even calculate your estimated CO2 foot print.</p>
<p>There are Mapping options to draw a route, with the ability to output directions, just not to a GPS device. (Although, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it came out soon.) I can even update a ride on my cell phone web browser and keep track as I ride.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using Entry Works since 2006, and I have found it to be great.</p>
<p>If anyone is looking for a slightly less complicated way of tracking your workouts/rides, you should check it out.</p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; Great site, and great photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17522</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17522</guid>
		<description>The design of this device is very cool. I agree with your assessment on the color scheme though, it really causes pause. 

As indicated in a previous blog, I picked up a power meter for Christmas. The analysis software is suffcient, but not as interesting as the Mac stuff Andy presented. 

Unfortunately, the on bike display of the Cyclops allows you to look at MPH OR heart rate. You can&#039;t view both at the same time. This revelation infuriated me to no end. 

So I if I want to see both MPH and heart rate on the same screen, I need to find another unit like the Garmin 500 ($350) or the Cyclops Joule ($500). Is there another to consider?

It appears that the two devices are similar in functionality. Tough to pay the extra $150 for compatible color scheme.

I noticed the Rapha site had additional photos streams on Chinle. Your signature on them is obvious. Really nice work.

You can expect an order for one of your albums shortly.

Ride on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The design of this device is very cool. I agree with your assessment on the color scheme though, it really causes pause. </p>
<p>As indicated in a previous blog, I picked up a power meter for Christmas. The analysis software is suffcient, but not as interesting as the Mac stuff Andy presented. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, the on bike display of the Cyclops allows you to look at MPH OR heart rate. You can&#8217;t view both at the same time. This revelation infuriated me to no end. </p>
<p>So I if I want to see both MPH and heart rate on the same screen, I need to find another unit like the Garmin 500 ($350) or the Cyclops Joule ($500). Is there another to consider?</p>
<p>It appears that the two devices are similar in functionality. Tough to pay the extra $150 for compatible color scheme.</p>
<p>I noticed the Rapha site had additional photos streams on Chinle. Your signature on them is obvious. Really nice work.</p>
<p>You can expect an order for one of your albums shortly.</p>
<p>Ride on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17520</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17520</guid>
		<description>If you happen to be a Mac computer user, there is an excellent software program that I&#039;ve been using now for 4-5 years to sync my Garmin (305 and 705).  It&#039;s called Ascent and it&#039;s excellent! 

Here&#039;s the link: http://www.montebellosoftware.com/

Enjoy!

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you happen to be a Mac computer user, there is an excellent software program that I&#8217;ve been using now for 4-5 years to sync my Garmin (305 and 705).  It&#8217;s called Ascent and it&#8217;s excellent! </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the link: <a href="http://www.montebellosoftware.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.montebellosoftware.com/</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17517</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17517</guid>
		<description>Thank you! She&#039;s still going through final build and fitting/testing, but I can&#039;t resist bragging about her!

I&#039;ll let you know how she rides when I&#039;ve put a few hundred miles down.

Love the blog - love the photography (I&#039;m also a photographer - some blog entries about your camera hardware/techniques would be great!) - keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! She&#8217;s still going through final build and fitting/testing, but I can&#8217;t resist bragging about her!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll let you know how she rides when I&#8217;ve put a few hundred miles down.</p>
<p>Love the blog &#8211; love the photography (I&#8217;m also a photographer &#8211; some blog entries about your camera hardware/techniques would be great!) &#8211; keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Velodramatic</title>
		<link>http://www.velodramatic.com/archives/4772/comment-page-1#comment-17515</link>
		<dc:creator>Velodramatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velodramatic.com/?p=4772#comment-17515</guid>
		<description>Oh, well done on the Willier, that&#039;s a beauty of a bike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, well done on the Willier, that&#8217;s a beauty of a bike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

